Evaluations

Family Man: 2012-13 Evaluation Scope

The purpose of this evaluation is to demonstrate the long-term impact and cost-effectiveness of Family Man to policy makers, funders, prisons and practitioners; and to complement Gwyneth Boswell’s qualitative study of the revised Family Man and other previous evaluations. read on →

Published 2013

Artform Drama

Organisation Safe Ground   Project venues Belmarsh, Birmingham, Bristol, Dovegate, Highpoint, Leeds, Parc, Wandsworth

Participant type Male and Female Adult Families of offenders, Male and Female Juvenile Families of offenders, Male Adult Offenders, Male and Female Adult Prison Staff

Sample size: 500

Review of "Family Man" - an intervention provided by Safe Ground

This review, by the Commissioning Strategies Group (CSG) of NOMS, examines the elements of the programme design and delivery of the Safe Ground 'Family Man' propgramme in relation to CSG standards for effective interventions. It covers:

  • Description of the programme - aims and objectives
  • Evidence base of theoretical orientation, goals ... read on →

    Authors Janet Creighton, Adrian Smith (Commissioning Strategies Group, NOMS)

    Published August 2011

    Artforms Drama, Multi-Arts

    Organisation Safe Ground

    • Developments in the HM Prison Service and Safe Ground Family Man programme, and the Safe Ground Network during 2007-8: An independent review

    The purpose of this evaulation was to examine the developments Safe Ground had made to one of its prison interventions, Family Man, and to the Safe Ground network during the period 2007-08 following recommendations made in previous reviews. It utilised semi structured qualitative face to face interviews, telephone interviews and questionnaires ... read on →

    Authors Gwyneth Boswell, Fiona Poland

    Published October 2008

    Artform Drama

    Organisation Safe Ground   Project venues Belmarsh, Wandsworth

    Participant type Male and Female Adult Families of offenders, Male Adult Offenders, Male and Female Adult Staff

    Sample size: 258

    Go to homepage

    Arts Alliance Evidence Library

    Filters: Drama [x], Impact of arts‑based approaches [x], Data analysis [x]

    Filter by:

    [x] close filter
    CJS Context [ + ]
    Prison (2)
    Prison and Community (2)
    Participant type [ + ]
    Families of offenders (2)
    Offenders (2)
    Prison Staff (1)
    Staff (1)
    Project venue [ + ]
    Belmarsh (2)
    Birmingham (1)
    Bristol (1)
    Dovegate (1)
    Highpoint (1)
    Leeds (1)
    Parc (1)
    Wandsworth (2)
    Region [ + ]
    England (3)
    Art form [ + ]
    Drama [x]
    Multi‑Arts (1)
    Project Outputs [ + ]
    Accreditation (1)
    Arts‑based workshops (3)
    Structured workshop programme (1)
    Model of Change [ + ]
    Adult learning theory (1)
    Desistance (2)
    Drama therapy (2)
    Social Learning Theories (1)
    Evaluation focus [ + ]
    Impact of arts‑based approaches [x]
    Attitudinal change (2)
    Behaviour change (2)
    Confidence (1)
    Cost benefit (1)
    Distinctive contribution of Arts (2)
    Emotional change (2)
    Impact of programme (3)
    Improved model of delivery (2)
    Learning outcomes (2)
    Personal development (2)
    Reducing offending (2)
    Rehabilitation (2)
    Self‑Esteem (1)
    Sense of self (1)
    Theoretical basis of programme (1)
    Value of Arts methodologies (1)
    Well Being (1)
    Key indicator [ + ]
    Attendance (1)
    Attitudes to parenting (2)
    Attitudinal change (2)
    Behavioural  change (2)
    Challenging offending (1)
    Commitment (1)
    Communication skills (1)
    Confidence (1)
    Engagement (1)
    Estimate of impact (2)
    Identity different from being offender (1)
    Impact on Institution (1)
    Listening skills (1)
    Methodological rigour (1)
    Offending rates (1)
    Outcomes data (1)
    Personal skills (1)
    Programme completion (1)
    Programme design (1)
    Programme integrity (1)
    Reducing offending (1)
    Relationships with families (2)
    Relationships with staff (2)
    Self‑Esteem (1)
    Social and Life Skills (1)
    Well Being (1)
    Methodology [ + ]
    Data analysis [x]
    Academic analysis (2)
    Assessments of change (2)
    Control Group (1)
    Evaluation reviews (2)
    Focus Groups (1)
    Interviews (1)
    Literature search (1)
    Programme analysis (1)
    Questionnaires (1)
    Reconviction study (1)
    Survey (1)
    Telephone interviews (1)
    Data type [ + ]
    Qualitative (1)
    Qualitative and Quantitative  (2)
    Research Limitations [ + ]
    Control Groups (1)
    Longer term impact (1)
    Measuring crime reduction (1)
    Sample size (1)
    Publication type [ + ]
    Academic Institution report (2)
    Government Department Review (1)
    Participant age [ + ]
    Juvenile (1)
    Adult (2)
    Participant gender [ + ]
    Male and Female (2)
    Male (2)
    Delivery methodologies [ + ]